People search "photo recovery software" for two very different problems, and picking the wrong tool is a common early mistake. If your photos were deleted, or you formatted a card by accident, the pixels may still sit on the drive until something overwrites them. That is an undelete job. Our own flash drive photo recovery tool handles that case, as do carving tools that scan free space.

Repair is the opposite situation. The file is right there in the folder, the right size on disk, but it opens as an error or a grey block. Nothing was deleted; the internal structure is broken. That is what every tool in this ranking is built for. The two jobs can also chain together. On r/mac, one user recovered deleted photos from an external drive, only to find none of them would open, hitting the error "it may be damaged or use a file format that Preview doesn't recognize," per the r/mac thread. Undelete brought the files back. Repair was still needed to make them viewable.

A JPEG stores a header, a set of markers, and the compressed image data in order. When a transfer cuts off partway, or a memory card develops bad sectors, some of that structure goes missing or lands out of place. The viewer hits a marker it cannot parse and shows an error or a grey band. This is why a folder thumbnail can look perfect while the full file fails: the small embedded preview survived, but the main image stream did not. One photographer on r/postprocessing described exactly that, old JPEGs off a flash drive whose thumbnails looked fine but opened "covered up by a rectangle" once loaded.

PSD files corrupt for a related reason, most often a crash or an unexpected restart during a save. Photoshop is partway through writing the layered document when the write is cut off, and the result opens with "unexpected end-of-file" or all layers gone. On r/photoshop, one user hit "could not open [file].psd because an unexpected end-of-file was encountered," and after clicking through the corrupt-layers warning, every drawn layer came back empty. Before reaching for third-party software, open Photoshop's own autosave and crash-recovery folder, which can hold a recoverable copy from just before the crash. That folder empties on a clean shutdown, so it only helps right after a crash. When it comes up empty, Adobe's own support community mostly steers people toward dedicated PSD repair tools, as in its PSD repair discussion.

Different viewers throw different errors for the same underlying corruption. Vendors like SysTools even index the exact strings people search, from "JPEG error #52" to the "Photocopier Effect." Matching the message to a cause helps you set expectations before you pick a tool.

Error you see	What is usually broken	What tends to work
"Not a valid image" / "file is not supported"	Header or opening markers damaged	A repair tool that rebuilds the JPEG structure, like Picture Doctor
"Unknown JPEG Format" / "JPEG error #52"	Invalid or misplaced JPEG marker	Marker-level repair; a same-camera reference file helps stubborn headers
Grey block or half-drawn image	Truncated or missing image data stream	Partial recovery only; a repairer may return the top rows or an embedded thumbnail
Repeated tiled or striped pattern ("Photocopier Effect")	Bit errors that desync the image data	Often only partial; a marker-level tool may help
"No preview available" / blank thumbnail	Embedded preview and main stream both lost	Try file-carving to re-extract, then repair; results vary
"Unexpected end-of-file" (PSD)	Save cut off, layer data incomplete	Photoshop's crash-recovery folder first, then a PSD-aware repair tool

The 7 best photo repair tools, reviewed

1. Picture Doctor by SoftOrbits (best for corrupted JPEG and PSD, including layer recovery)

Picture Doctor is the tool we make, and it aims at one job. It rebuilds corrupted or truncated JPEG and PSD files that error with "not an image" or "file is not supported." You point it at the broken files, it repairs the damaged structure, and it saves the result as BMP while preserving the original dimensions and EXIF data. The standout is PSD support. It opens Photoshop documents from version 3 through 26 and restores the layers as editable layers, which is rare in this category and speaks directly to the "empty layers after a crash" pain people describe. Batch mode lets you run a folder of damaged files in one pass. There is a free trial with a watermark so you can see what comes back before you pay. You can read the full spec on the Picture Doctor page.

Pros:

Repairs both corrupted JPEG and PSD, which most single tools do not

Restores PSD layers you can still edit, not just a flattened image

Processes a whole folder of damaged files in one batch run

Preserves original dimensions and EXIF from the source file

Keeps the workflow simple, with no reference file needed

Cons:

Windows only, with no Mac build

Repairs JPEG and PSD only, so formats like RAW and HEIC are out of scope

Saves the repaired image as BMP, so you may re-export afterward

Roughly half of badly damaged files come back, by our own estimate

Repairs structure, not lost pixels, and cannot recover deleted photos

Verdict: the pick to start with if your problem is a corrupted JPEG or a damaged PSD on Windows, especially when Photoshop layers are involved.
Our take: we keep it around because it does the boring part well and stays honest about the rest. The PSD layer recovery is the feature we would miss most. We make it, so weigh that, but the layer support is the genuine reason it sits at the top for this specific job.

   

 Download for Free

2. Stellar Repair for Photo (best for the widest format and RAW coverage)

Stellar covers the widest range of formats on this list. Beyond JPEG it repairs a long list of RAW formats from most camera brands, plus HEIC and TIFF, and it runs on both Windows and Mac. That breadth is the main reason people reach for it, and it can extract embedded thumbnails from files too damaged to fully repair. The honest catch is the free version. It previews the repaired image but will not save it, and the pricing splits into paid tiers, with the pricier plans adding video and data recovery on top of photo repair. Its real-world success on the worst-hit files is also disputed, more on that below. Check current specs and pricing on the Stellar Repair for Photo page.

Pros:

Repairs the widest set of formats here, including many RAW types

Runs on both Windows and Mac

Extracts thumbnails from files it cannot fully repair

Ships frequent updates from an established brand

Cons:

Free version previews only and will not save the result

Charges to save a repair, with video and recovery gated to pricier tiers

64-bit only, with no support for older systems

Reported results on severe damage are inconsistent

Verdict: the best choice for the RAW files that JPEG-and-PSD tools cannot touch.
Our take: from the docs and user reports, this is the one we would point a photographer to for RAW off a card. We have not bought the paid tiers, so treat the "advanced repair" claims as vendor material until you test the free preview yourself.

3. Wondershare Repairit (best for repairing photos plus video and documents)

Repairit shows up in nearly every repair roundup because it covers more than photos. The same family repairs video and documents too, under one roof, with desktop and online versions. For photos it handles JPG and PNG, plus more than fifteen formats in all, and it markets an AI mode for tougher files. Wondershare publishes its own success figures, which we treat as vendor claims rather than verified fact. On Trustpilot the picture is mixed. Some users praise the video repair specifically, while others report auto-renewal billing and refused refunds. The photo module ships in both the desktop app and the online version.

98% / 89%

Source

Pros:

Handles photos plus video and documents from one app

Handles 15+ image formats, more than most single-format tools

Offers desktop and online versions for different workflows

Draws user praise for results on corrupted video

Cons:

Vendor-published success rates are self-reported, not independently tested

Trustpilot reports of auto-renewal and refund refusals

"Advanced repair" mode reported by some users as producing no result

Pricing not clearly shown before download

Verdict: worth a look if you also need to fix corrupted video or documents, not just photos.
Our take: the multi-format reach is real and useful, but the marketing runs ahead of what users report. We would use the free path first and ignore the headline percentages.

4. EaseUS Fixo Photo Repair (best for repair inside a broader recovery suite)

EaseUS Fixo is the photo-repair module of a well-known recovery brand, which suits people who want one vendor for undelete and repair. It repairs common image formats plus RAW files from phones and cameras, on Windows and Mac, with a clean two-step interface. As with several tools here, the trial previews but does not save. One nice cross-check: EaseUS's own best-of roundup independently lists our Picture Doctor and describes its JPEG-plus-PSD and batch feature set accurately, which is a small vote of confidence from a competitor. See the EaseUS photo repair roundup.

Pros:

Repairs common formats plus RAW from many device types

Bundles repair into a broader recovery suite

Guides you through a clean two-step workflow

Runs on Windows and Mac

Cons:

Trial previews only and will not save repaired files

Slower on large files, especially the online version

RAW handling hits limits on badly corrupted files

Independent, non-vendor reviews are thin

Verdict: a sensible pick if you already use EaseUS for recovery and want repair from the same place.
Our take: the interface is friendly and the feature list is honest. We judge this from docs and its vendor testimonials rather than a paid test, so weigh the trial preview before buying.

5. JPEG-Repair Toolkit by DiskTuna (best for technical users doing header and marker repair)

This one is for people who like to understand what they are fixing. Built by a single data-recovery specialist, JPEG-Repair Toolkit works at the header and marker level, realigning invalid markers and patching bad-sector damage, and it can pull a JPEG from a RAW file's embedded thumbnail. The tradeoff is that serious header repair often needs a "reference file," a good photo shot on the same camera and settings, so the tool can borrow a valid structure. That is powerful but not beginner-friendly. The developer's own writeups are, frankly, the clearest technical explanation of JPEG corruption we found anywhere. See the JPEG-Repair Toolkit page.

Pros:

Gives deep, header-level control over JPEG repair

Extracts JPEGs from RAW file thumbnails

Documents the repair process unusually clearly

Includes lifetime updates in the license bundle

Cons:

Header repair often needs a same-camera reference photo

Steep learning curve for non-technical users

JPEG focused, with no PSD support

Windows only

Verdict: the tool to choose if you are comfortable with reference files and want real control over the repair.
Our take: the documentation alone taught us things about JPEG structure. For a casual user it is overkill, but for a stubborn header case it is exactly right.

6. SysTools JPEG Repair (best for chasing a specific JPEG error code)

SysTools JPEG Repair targets people who search by the exact error on their screen. Its page names the strings users type verbatim, like "JPEG error #52," "Unknown JPEG Format error," and the tiled "Photocopier Effect" artifact, and it fixes header and bit-error damage in JPEG files. It supports a wide range of Windows versions, down to legacy releases. There are downsides. Pricing is not published on the page. There is no clear batch mode, and the legacy-first OS support hints at an older codebase. See the SysTools JPEG Repair page.

Pros:

Matches specific JPEG error codes users search for

Repairs header and bit-error damage

Supports a broad range of Windows versions

Cons:

No pricing published on the product page

No clear batch-processing mode

Dated feel and legacy-first OS support

JPEG only, with no PSD or RAW

Verdict: worth a try when your problem is a named JPEG error code and you want a tool built around that.
Our take: the error-code framing is genuinely helpful for matching your exact symptom. We would confirm the price directly before committing.

7. SecureRecovery for Photo by OfficeRecovery (best for a desktop plus cloud option)

OfficeRecovery is a long-running brand whose photo tool (formerly sold as PixRecovery) offers both a desktop build and an online repair option, which helps if you cannot install software. It repairs common non-RAW formats like JPEG, PNG and TIFF in the standard product. The wrinkle is the SKU split. RAW support lives in a separate purchase, which can confuse buyers, and the trial output is watermarked. Pricing is public, unlike some rivals here.

$19.99

Source

Pros:

Offers both desktop and cloud repair options

Publishes upfront pricing

Repairs common non-RAW formats

Comes from an established, long-running vendor

Cons:

RAW support is a separate purchase

Trial output is watermarked

Two-SKU split confuses buyers

No PSD layer repair

Verdict: a reasonable option when you want a cloud fallback alongside a desktop tool.
Our take: the split RAW SKU is annoying, but the public pricing and cloud option are points in its favor. We assessed it from its specs and pricing page, not a paid run.

Repair software is often the right answer, but a few free steps can save you the trouble. First, open the file in a second viewer. A tool like IrfanView or even your browser will sometimes render a file another app rejects, and if it opens, a quick "Save As" can write a clean copy. Photographers on DPReview repeat this as the first move for a stubborn JPEG off a card, alongside a firm warning we will get to. Second, for a PSD, check Photoshop's crash-recovery folder before anything else, since a mid-save crash may have left a usable version there. Third, if the file lives on a memory card or a failing drive, copy it to your PC first and work on the copy, never the original.

Only after those steps is a dedicated tool worth buying, such as our own JPEG and PSD repair tool. Point it at a copy of the broken file, run the repair, and check the result honestly against what you expected. If a tool offers a preview before saving, use it, so you know what you are paying for.

We looked at more than seven tools. A few common names did not make the ranking, and it is worth saying why, because "not listed" is not the same as "bad."

• Remo Repair JPEG and Yodot JPEG Repair are real JPEG tools, but their photo lines lean toward deleted-photo recovery rather than corruption repair, and neither offered anything the ranked tools do not.
• Kernel Photo Repair appears in roundups, yet in a real multi-tool test one user ran on childhood photos with a corrupted header, it was not the tool that produced a result. That made it hard to place with confidence over better-documented options.
• JPEG Medic is worth knowing about. In that same user test on the r/AskADataRecoveryPro thread, it was the only one of five tools that recovered even thumbnails. Its thin public footprint and single-signal evidence kept it off the main list.
• PhotoRec and TestDisk are free and open source, but they carve and undelete files from a drive. They recover data. They do not rebuild a corrupted file's internal structure, so they solve the other problem.

The right tool depends less on brand and more on your exact file and how hands-on you want to be.

• The Photoshop user with a corrupt PSD: if a crash left you with empty layers or an "unexpected end-of-file" error, start with Picture Doctor. It is the pick here built to bring PSD layers back in editable form, after you have checked Photoshop's own crash-recovery folder.
• The photographer with corrupt RAW off a card: JPEG-and-PSD tools will not touch a CR2 or NEF file. Stellar Repair for Photo has the broadest RAW coverage, so start there and use the free preview before buying.
• The person who wants a free, one-off online fix: if you do not want to install anything and privacy on a single non-sensitive photo is not a worry, a browser tool like jpg.repair repairs a JPEG by borrowing a header from a reference photo. It uploads your file to the cloud and asks for payment to download the result, so weigh that trade-off.
• The non-technical user with a broken JPEG: skip the header-level tools. A simple repairer with a preview, or Picture Doctor's batch mode for a folder of files, will get you further than a tool that expects you to supply a reference file.

• Stellar Repair for Photo Vendor spec page for format and RAW coverage, free-tier limits, and pricing tiers.
• Wondershare Repairit Vendor page and published self-reported success rates, cited here as vendor claims.
• EaseUS photo repair roundup Competitor best-of that independently lists Picture Doctor's feature set.
• DiskTuna half-grey repair testing Independent testing of vendor demo claims, source of the honesty framing.
• OfficeRecovery SecureRecovery for Photo Published pricing and the RAW-vs-non-RAW SKU split.