2. Topaz Photo AI - best raw AI quality for noise and detail

Topaz Photo AI is Photo Restoration Software for professionals who put image quality first. Its denoise, sharpening and upscaling models rank among the best, with community praise for night-shot denoise. Topaz moved to a subscription-only model in September 2025, ending the perpetual license.

Pick Topaz for image quality if you will use another program for scratches and color. In my test, it removed heavy grain from a dim scan while keeping skin texture. Almost nothing else here managed that without making the skin waxy.

3. PhotoGlory - best one-time pick for beginners

PhotoGlory is desktop Photo Restoration Software for beginners restoring old prints. Its guided workflow takes you through damage removal, color restoration and colorization, with batch support. Check the purchase tiers and trial limits in our PhotoGlory review before buying.

Choose PhotoGlory if you prefer a guided wizard. In my test, it took me from damage removal to color one screen at a time, a good approach for your first restoration. It struggled with the portrait I supplied, where its lack of a dedicated face model showed.

4. AKVIS Retoucher - best content-aware patching

AKVIS Retoucher removes scratches, dust, stains and whole objects by filling the area with surrounding texture. You can run it standalone or as a Photoshop plugin on Windows and Mac, an uncommon combination among these 8 programs.

Choose AKVIS when patching damaged areas is your main job, especially if you already use Photoshop. I brushed over a tear, and it filled the gap with grain from both sides more cleanly than any clone stamp. My test did not cover standalone use.

5. Adobe Photoshop - best manual Photo Restoration Software for pros

Photoshop gives you the deepest manual restoration controls: healing brushes, the clone stamp and content-aware fill, plus a Neural Filter for photo restoration and colorization. Users on the Adobe community forums report halftone artifacts from the restoration Neural Filter and a brownish cast from colorization.

Photoshop suits experienced retouchers who want full manual control. I would not buy it for one box of family scans. The restoration Neural Filter left halftone speckles on my test print, and cleaning them up by hand took time.

6. HitPaw FotorPea - most AI models in one Photo Restoration app

HitPaw FotorPea has the widest selection of AI models here: separate models for denoise, faces, colorization and scratch repair, plus high-resolution upscaling and batch processing. Restoration quality scored highly in a comparison test by LetsEnhance, but HitPaw was the slowest of the 4 programs tested. Its trial watermarks most features. Our HitPaw FotorPea review examines pricing, credits and the independent findings.

~60 sec

Source

Consider HitPaw if you want a wide choice of AI models and can accept the cost and processing time. The trial watermark made quality hard to judge until I paid, and credit costs add up.

7. MyHeritage Photo Enhancer - easiest web and mobile pick

MyHeritage lets you enhance, colorize or animate a photo with one tap through its genealogy platform. It is a friendly starting point if you have little editing experience. Reviewers report limited repair on severely damaged prints.

The free tier returned my enhanced, colorized scan in about half a minute. Lightly faded areas looked good; the scratched, torn corner barely improved. I would use it for a quick enhancement, but the watermark and upload ruled it out for my private restoration work.

8. Remini - best mobile face enhancer

Remini sharpens small, blurry portraits on your phone and has over 100 million downloads. For old faces, its smoothing can produce the uncanny, plastic-skin look users describe. Its cloud privacy policy allows uploaded photos to be retained for up to 12 months.

100M+

Source

Use Remini for a phone portrait. On a cropped face from my test scan, it brought eyes and skin into focus in seconds. When I supplied the full scan, it left scratches and the torn corner untouched while smoothing the face until it no longer looked quite like the person.

Of the 8 programs here, the 5 fully offline desktop options process photos on your machine. A widely shared complaint on r/windowsapps put the concern plainly: "every AI photo app turns into a subscription trap or forces you to upload your family photos to some server you know nothing about." For photos of relatives, especially children, local processing with Photo Retoucher avoids those uploads. A web service is a reasonable trade for non-personal images when you want no installation.

A box of 50 to 200 inherited scans can be a weekend project. On r/TopazLabs, occasional users described buying a single 1-month subscription to finish a project and cancel. Others noted the combined cost of Adobe, Topaz and another program.

Exact prices change; our current price is on the product page. If you already pay for Creative Cloud or need high-quality AI every month, a subscription can make sense.

In a much-quoted r/photoshop thread about a grandmother's fire-damaged photo, the poster says "every single company using AI makes them look like a completely different person." A top comment on r/ChatGPT describes generative programs as making a replacement: they "make their own new image" resembling the original.

The common failure is over-smoothing. This explanation of AI headshot artifacts describes algorithms blurring high-frequency detail and removing natural pore texture. When you use AI photo restoration software for dust, scratches and noise, keep manual brushes ready to correct faces. A focused image sharpening pass can also sharpen a soft scan without spoiling the face.

I tested each free option with the same faded scan. Fotor's free tier produced a quick auto-enhance with a watermark. LetsEnhance has a dedicated old-photo model and charges a credit per image, which adds up across a box of scans.

GIMP is free and works offline. It kept my scan on my machine, but restoration is fully manual: you clone out scratches by hand, and learning the program takes work.
Free services give weaker results on severely torn or stained originals. For a print with scratches and several other problems, a one-time desktop purchase can save you repeating the work. Our guide to dust and scratch removal software covers repairs for dust and surface scratches.

Also considered: Best Photo Restoration Software that did not make the cut

• Luminar Neo. A capable general editor that added dedicated restoration in November 2025. Its record on torn, scratched prints is still short compared with programs built for restoration.
• VanceAI. Offers decent upscaling and a restoration model, but cloud processing uploads your scans and each batch uses credits. Our enlarger review covers that feature.
• Upscayl. Free and open-source, but limited to upscaling. It has no scratch repair, colorization or face restoration, so it sharpens damage along with the photo.
• Palette.fm and ImageColorizer. Both colorize black-and-white photos well, but that is their only job. Use them as a second step.
• Windows Photos and Google Photos. The built-in PC and phone enhancers handle light automatic fixes, but cannot repair scratches or tears.

How to choose the best photo restoration software for your photos

If you need photo restoration software for Windows and you have a stack of old family prints with mixed damage to fix privately, an all-in-one offline tool like Photo Retoucher covers the most ground with the least app-switching. Otherwise, decide whether your photos must stay off the cloud and whether this is a single project or ongoing work. A mobile app suits a blurry face crop.

• Family archivist with 200 scans showing mixed damage. For private restoration with less switching between programs, choose an all-in-one offline program such as Photo Retoucher.
• Quality purist with otherwise clean scans that are noisy, soft or scanned below 300 DPI. Topaz gives the cleanest detail; pair it with another program for scratches and color.
• Casual user with one faded snapshot and no budget. A free web enhancement is the fastest start if you accept watermarks and uploads.
• Photoshop pro who already has the manual tools. Stay with Photoshop; its level of control is hard to beat once you know it.

Sources

• Topaz Photo AI. Official product and pricing page; subscription-only model.
• Adobe Photoshop community thread. Users report Neural Filter artifacts and a color cast.
• LetsEnhance comparison test. Third-party speed and quality test of HitPaw, MyHeritage and others.
• Over-smoothing in AI enhancement. Technical explanation of the plastic-face failure mode.
• 2026 photo restoration roundup. Comparison table confirming Topaz lacks scratch repair.
• Photo restoration tool breakdown. Category split by scratch removal, colorize, and upscale.